EACH DISCUSSION MUST BE AT LEAST 150 WORDS AND CLEARLY SEPERATED. TDISCUSSION 1Deductive Language Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then, construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form.DISCUSSION 2Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger, either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion.DISCUSSION 3Considering the fallacies discussed in Chapter Four of.next.ecollege.com/default/launch.ed?ssoType=CDMS&redirectUrl=https://content.ashford.edu/ssologin?bookcode=AUPHI103.11.2″>An Introduction to Logic, constructthreedifferent arguments that display distinct fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does. Review your classmates’ examples and see if they, in fact, commit the fallacy identified.Discussion 4One rich source of fallacies is the media: television, radio, magazines, and the Internet (including, of course, commercials.) Identifytwodistinct fallacies you see committed in the media. Do you think it is more likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies having studied logic? What do you think those presenting these arguments assume about the logical skills of their viewers? Is this a good or bad assumption for them to make?

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon

Order Now